Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res. 11(1-2): 85-89, 2005

Integrated Management Of Cattails In Water

Carriage Ways Of Pakistan

Tahira Z. Mahmood[1]

       ABSTRACT

Cattail, Typha angustata (= T. domingensis) is an emergent aquatic weed causing serious problems in drainage channels. Studies were carried out to manage its natural population in water drainage by integrating different control measures. Of the four treatments studied, the best one was where mowing of Typha was followed by planting paragrass (Brachiaria mutica) consequently reducing the weed population by 94.7%. Paragrass completely replaced cattail in one year time. Paraquat spray gave a good immediate control (84.2% reduction) however, regrowth from underground rhizomes created a problem. Mowing + paragrass planting  is  recommended for managing cattails in the water carriage ways. Further research is suggested to confirm our findings under ecological conditions of Pakistan.

 

Key words: Typha control, paraquat, paragrass, mowing


INTRODUCTION

Cattail, Typha angustata Chaub. & Bory (= T. domingensis Pers.) is an emergent aquatic weed and causes serious problems in the water carriage ways of Pakistan. It is widely distributed in water-logged areas and along irrigation/drainage channels threatening to impede the flow of water and increase evaporation. In some regions it has been reported as a pest hard to eradicate from irrigation canals and ditches (Chaudhry, 1969). Cattails are tall, upto about 2 meters, grass like plants with fleshy leaves. They spread rapidly by rhizomes and by small, airborne seeds that may remain viable for 5 years or more (Martin et al., 1957; Chaudhry and Zawawi, 1983; Chaudhry,1969). Cattails are the characteristic of situations having a water table ranging from just below ground level to about half the maximum height of the plant (Woodford, 1960). Studies have shown that fire, hydrology as well as surface water nutrients are limiting factors for cattail abundance (Newman et al., 1996,1998). Many different control measures have been carried out against the weed including use of chemicals as dalapon (Saghir and Chaudhry, 1985) glyphosate (Kay, 1999) atrazine and paraquat (Moore et al., 1957; Hellsten et al., 1999) and bio-agents as insects (Landau et al., 1996), grass carp and pathogens (Wheeler and Stoops, 1998; Tsuchiya, 1979; Barreto and Evans, 1996) as well as by replacement technique (Mehta and Sharma, 1974).

While carrying out benefit/cost analysis of cattail control many researchers considered it as a useful plant. With the control of Typha, populations of other species such as waterfowl enhanced that was harmful for sunflower producers and upland game was reduced (Leitch et al., 1997). Cattails have been used in all parts of the world as food, bedding, roofing and parts have been used to make baskets, shoes, rope and paper. Cattail ointments have been used for treatment of snakebite, measles, insanity and many other disorders (Anon, 1981). Of all wild plants, cattails have been called the most useful emergency food source. They are also a source of pulp, paper and fiber (Morton, 1975). However, in water drains they create immense problem and therefore the present studies were carried out to manage Typha’s natural population in water drain by integrating different control measures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Site was selected at National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad. Healthy plants of Typha angustata were growing in water drain. The height of plants was 2-3 ˝ ft. Some of them had heads. Four treatments and a control was replicated thrice in randomized complete block design. The treatments included weedy check, mowing + paragrass planting, paraquat (Gramoxone) spray @ 3.75 L ha-1, repeated mowing thrice and Mowing + paraquat spray + planting paragrass.

Since the plants were growing on sides of the water drain, plots were accordingly made in a size 2 x 1 m2. Paraquat spraying, first mowing and paragrass planting were done on June 10, 2000. Second mowing was done 15 days later while 3rd and 4th mowings were done one and two months later, respectively. Paragrass (Brachiaria mutica) was obtained from Barani Livestock Station, Fateh Jang. It is a valuable for fodder and is being used for experimental purposes at the station. Mowing of Typha was done by cutting the leaves of the plants. The data for the individual parameter were subjected to ANOVA technique and the means were separated by Fisher’s protected LSD test (Steel and Torrie, 1980).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Natural population of Typha showed a decrease in winter i.e. in November. However, afterwards it increased reaching to a peak in May/June. This population trend was observed in most of the treatments (Fig. 1).The data in Table-1 indicates significant differences among the treatments. The best being mowing of cattail and planting of paragrass that reduced 94.7% of Typha population. Paragrass being a highly competitive species got established and covered Typha plants cutting off solar radiation from them. Typha population almost vanished 5 months after planting paragrass and the grass replaced Typha completely in one year time. Similar results were obtained by Mehta and Sharma (1974) who stated that the grass could control Typha and solve the problem of unproductive land.

Paraquat spray and mowing + paraquat spray + planting paragrass, treatment also controlled Typha (84.2% and 78.1% reduction, respectively). However, new plants emerged from the underground rhizomes. Repeated spraying may have a better result. Some other herbicides may also be tested as Moore et al. (1999) stated that atrazine gave better control as compared with paraquat in an aqueous 7-d germination and growth experiments. Considering the extent of the control by repeated mowing it may be mentioned that water level decreased in the experimental area during the winter months. Though mowing was done but was not below the water level. As indicated by Martin et al. (1957) while testing the efficiency of a hydraulic weed cutting boat mentioned that cutting at 20 cm and 50 cm below the water surface was very effective in removing Typha stands. Results of Newman et al. (1998) showed that increased water depth and duration of flood have a significant impact on cattail expansion. Therefore, re-growths took place in the repeated mowing treatment plots and good control could not be obtained.

Thus for permanent management of T. angustata stands in marshy/drainage ditches, replacement by B. mutica is very useful. Paragrass may clear the unproductive land and may be utilized as fodder. However, this method may not be useful in water channels where unobstructed flow of water is required all the year round.

Table-1.      Effect of different treatments on Typha angustata population in different treatments.

S. No.

Treatments

Initial No. of plants (Av)

Final No. of plants (Av)

Reduction (%) (Av)

1.

Weedy check

36

32 a2

11.1 d

2.

Mowing + planting paragrass

38

2 d

94.7 a

3.

Paraquat @3.75 L ha-1

38

6 c

84.2 ab

4.

Repeated mowing

38

15 b

60.5 c

5.

Mowing + paraquat + planting paragrass

32

7 c

78.1 b

2 Means sharing a letter in common in the respective column do not differ significantly by LSD test at 5% probability level.

 

Fig.1:           Population trend of T. angustata in different treatments (See Table-1 for Series) during the year. 

 

                                                                                                                           

REFERENCES CITED

Anon.  1981. Typha not just another weed. Newsletter of IPPC Aquatic Weed Programme of Univ. of Florida. Aquaphyte 1 (1): 1-8.

Barreto, R.W. and H.C. Evans. 1996. Fungal pathogens of some Brazilian aquatic weeds and their potential use in biocontrol. Proc.9th Inter. Symp. Biological Control of Weeds, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 121-126.

Chaudhry, S.A. 1969. Flora  of Lyallpur and The Adjacent Canal – Colony Districts. West Pakistan Agricultural Univ. Lyallpur 177 pp.

Chaudhry, S.A. and M.A. Zawawi. 1983.  A Manual of Weeds of Central and Eastern Saudi Arabia. National Herbarium, Ministry of Agric. and Water, Saudi Arabia, Riyadh: 284-285.

Hellsten, S., C. Dieme, M. Mbengue, G.A. Janauer, den N.Hollander and A.H.Pieterse. 1999.  Typha control efficiency of a weed – cutting boat in the Lac de Guiers in Senegal. In: Biology, ecology and management of aquatic plants. Proc.10th Intern. Symp. on Aquatic Weeds. European Weed Res. Soc. Hydrobiologia 415: 249-255.

Kay, S.H. 1999. Evaluation of SP1001 (pelargonic acid) in combination with glyphosate on cattail and alligator weeds. J. Aqua. PI. Mang. 37: 29-31.

Landau, D., J.F. Grant and P.L. Lambdin. 1996. Dicymolomia julianalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on selected hosts in eastern and middle Tennessee. Environ. Entomol. 25(1): 25-28.

Leitch, J.A., G.M. Linz and J.F. Baltezore. 1997. Economics of cattail (Typha spp.) control to reduce blackbird damage to sunflower. Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 65(2): 141-149.

Martin, A.C., C. Erickson and J.H. Steenis.1957.U.S.D.A. Circular No. 19.

Mehta, I. and R.K. Sharma. 1974. Biological Control of Typha. Biotrop, Bogor 7p. In South-eastern Asian Workshop on Aquatic Weeds, Indonesia, Malang 25-29 June, 1974.

Moore, M.T., D.B. Huggett, G.M. Huddleston, J.H. Rodgers (Jr.) and C.M. Cooper 1999. Herbicide effects on Typha latifolia (Linneaus) germination and root and shoot development. Chemosphere 38 (159): 3637-3647.

Morton, J.F. 1975 Cattails (Typha spp.) weed problem or potential crop? Econ. Bot. 29(1): 7-29.

Newman, S., J.B.Grace and J.W.Koebel. 1996. Effects of nutrients and hydroperiod on Typha,    Cladium, and Eleocharies implications for everglades restoring. Eco. Appl. 6(3): 774-783.

Newman, S., J.Schuette, K.Rutchey, T.Fontaine, K.R.Reddy and M.Pietrucha. 1998. Factors influencing cattail abundance in the northern Everglades. Aquatic. Bot. 60( 3):265-280.

Saghir, A.R. and S.A. Chaudhry. 1985. Weed Control Handbook for Saudi Arabia, Dept. of Agric. Res. and Regional Agric. and Water Res. Cen., Min. Agric. and Water. Saudi Arabia 98 P.

Steel, R.G.D. and J.H.Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics, a biological approach. 2nd ed. McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc., New York.

Tsuchiya, M. 1979 Control of aquatic weeds by grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus Val.) JARQ 13(3): 200-203.

Wheeler, A.G. (Jr.) and C.A. Stoops. 1999. Chilacis typhae (Perrin) and Holcocranum saturejae (Kolenati): (Hemiptera: Lygaeoidea : Artheneidea): First Western North American records of two Palearctic cattail bugs. Pan-Pacific Entomol. 751:52-54.

Woodford, E.K. 1960. Weed Control Handbook. The British Weed Control Council, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford 264 pp.


1           Coordinator/Programme Leader/Principal Scientific Officer,

National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad – Pakistan.      

 

Copyrights© Weed Science Society of Pakistan®

Department of Weed Science
NWFP Agricultural University Peshawar, 25130 Pakistan