|
|
Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res. 11(3-4): 81 - 87, 2005 Parthenium hysterophorus L. – A NOXIOUS ALIEN WEED
Arshad Javaid[1] and Tehmina Anjum
ABSTRACT
Key words: Parthenium, distribution, Pakistan, Punjab, allepathy Parthenium hysterophorus L. is a fast maturing annual native to the subtropics of North and South America. The survey of various districts of Punjab reveals that this weed is spreading rapidly in rain fed districts of Punjab viz. Sialkot, Gujranwala, Shekhupura, Lahore, Kasur, Hafizabad, Rawalpindi and Islamabad. The districts of southern Punjab viz. Multan, Bahawalpur and Bahawalnagar are either free or have very little infestation of this weed. This weed is very common along the roadsides, around the agricultural fields and on wastelands. The weed is rapidly replacing the local flora. The weed starts growing in February and remains dominant species in wastelands till winter. During winter the weed population becomes negligible. The allelopathic grasses like Desmostachya bipinnata Stapf. and Imperata cylindrica (L). Beauv. restrict the spread of this weed. So far this weed is not a problem of common crops like rice, wheat, maize and others. Nevertheless it invades the fields of some vegetables like Citrullus vulgaris where crop density is low especially when cropping is done on ridges. It was found that cows, buffalos and sheep do not eat this weed while goats do. This weed can be used as a green manure for maize and wheat.
INTRODUCTION Parthenium hysterophorus L. is an upright annual herb of 30-150 cm of family Asteraceae. It is native to subtropics of North and South America (Adkins et al., 1996) and was accidentally introduced in subcontinent in 1955 through imported food grains. The weed has been rapidly spread in last twenty years and now it occurs widely along the roadsides, wastelands and sometimes in crop fields. The high dominance of Parthenium is attributed to its fast growth rate, high reproductive potential, adaptive nature and interference by allelopathy (Kohli and Rani, 1994). P. hysterophorus establishes only from seeds, which can germinate anytime of year given suiTable-moisture levels. Plants flower when they are 4-8 weeks old and may flower for several months (Dhawan and Dhawan, 1996). An individual plant may produce 15,000-25,000 seeds (Navie et al., 1996). The weed lacks natural enemies in Pakistan. P. hysterophorus posses a serious health risk. The chemical analysis has indicated that all the plant parts including trichomes and pollens contain toxins called sesquiterpene lactones. The major components of toxin being ‘Parthenin’ and other phenolic acids such as caffeic acid, vanillic acid, anisic acid, chlorogenic acid and parahydroxy benzoic acid are lethal to human beings and animals (Oudhia, 1998). In addition to health hazards a lot of available data also highlights its impact on agriculture as well as natural ecosystems (Chippendale and Panetta, 1994; Evans, 1997). The weed is rapidly spreading in Pakistan. The present study reports the distribution of P. hysterophorus in wastelands and agricultural fields, effect of allelopathic grasses on distribution of P. hysterophorus and grazing response of cattle towards P. hysterophorus. MATERIALS AND METHODSSurveys of different districts of the province Punjab were undertaken during the years 2003-2005 to study the distribution of P. hysterophorus. In the surveyed areas P. hysterophorus distribution was studied on wastelands, along the roadsides, and along the sides and inside of the fields of various agricultural crops. In order to study the impact of P. hysterophorus on the distribution of native weeds, data was collected from undisturbed localities along the side of BRB canal near Daska, district Sialkot using 1x1 m2 quadrate. Frequency and density of P. hysterophorus and other weed species was estimated by applying the following formulas:
Effect of other weed species especially perennial grasses on distribution of this weed species was also studied. The liking of animals including cows, buffalos, sheep and goats to parthenium was studied by observing these animals grazing in the pastures. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Distribution of P. hysterophorus in wastelandsA general survey revealed that Parthenium has established itself in rain-fed districts of the province Punjab viz. Sialkot, Gujranwala, Lahore, Kasur, Shekhupura, Gujrat, Jehlem, Rawalpindi/Islamabad. It is also spreading up hills from Islamabad towards Murree. However, the districts of southern Punjab viz. Bahawalpur, Multan and Bahawalnagar were either free of Parthenium colonization or there was a little infestation of this weed. Low rain fall and salinity could be the possible regions of low Parthenium colonization in these areas. The weed is also spreading in Kashmir. Most of the wastelands were found colonized by P. hysterophorus. Data collected from various localities in district Sialkot reveals that this weed was dominating the local flora at these sites with highest absolute frequency (AF) of 80%. The rest of the weed species showed 10–60% frequency of occurrence. Achyranthes aspera, Carthamus oxycantha, Malvestrum coromandelianum and Cynodon dactylon were found more frequent with 40-50% AF, than rest of the weed species with 10-30% AF. The highest relative frequency (RF) of 18.6% was exhibited by P. hysterophorus followed by C. dactylon (13.9%), M. coromandelianum (11.6%), C. oxycantha (11.6%) and A. aspera (9.3%), respectively. The rest of the weed species exhibited less than 7 RF (Table-1). The highest absolute density (AD) of 41 was exhibited by P. hysterophorus followed by C. dactylon (39), M. coromandelianum (11.8) and C. oxycantha (5.9). The rest of the weed species showed an AD of less than 5. The relative density (RD) of P. hysterophorus and other weed species also exhibited a pattern similar to that of AD (Table-1). The domination and rapid spread of P. hysterophorus in wastelands with gradual reduction of local flora could be attributed to its invasive capacity, allelopathic properties, high growth rate, short growth cycle and large number of seed production (Srivastava et al., 1985; Evans, 1997; Oudhia, 1998). It has been reported as causing a total habitat change in native Australian grasslands, open woodlands, riverbanks and flood plains (McFadyen, 1992; Chippendale and Panetta, 1994). Similar invasions of Parthenium in National Wildlife Park in Southern India has also been reported (Evans, 1997). Effect of perennial allelopathic grasses on distribution of P. hysterophorus There was a very high infestation of P. hysterophorus in herb zone. The frequency and density of P. hysterophorus in this zone was 80 and 40, respectively. Both Desmostachya bipinnata and Imperata cylindrica colonization markedly reduced the distribution of this weed. The frequency and density of P. hysterophorus in D. bipinnata and I. cylindrica zone were reduced to 30 and 20, and 5 and 3, respectively (Figs. 1 & 2). This reduced frequency and density of P. hysterophorus in D. bipinnata and I. cylindrica dominating zones could be attributed to the release of water soluble allelochemicals released from roots and shoot of these grasses (Javaid et al., 2005; Anjum et al., 2005). Invasion of P. hysterophorus in agricultural fields Heavy infestation of P. hysterophorus was found along the boundaries of the fields of agronomic and horticultural crops. However, P. hysterophorus was not found in the fields of economically important crops like rice, maize and wheat (Fig. 3). A careful observation over a period of one year revealed that the weed start to germinate in the fallow fields but later agricultural practices and crop competition generally eliminate it from the fields. It generally grows in field when crop is grown on ridges and furrows. It grows only on ridges. The weed can also grow in a field when a comparatively less competitive crop that does not cover the soil completely is sown as Citrullus vulgaris (Fig. 3D). Very few plants of P. hysterophorus were found growing in the fields of Trifolium alexandrinum only on the ridges. It seems probable that P. hysterophorus is unable to compete with most of the crops especially cereals. Furthermore, it is unable to cope with the agricultural practices and generally grows outside the agricultural fields. It is a common observation that P. hysterophorus does not grow on damp soils. Since it generally grows only on ridges in the fields, it is likely that irrigation schedule of the agricultural crops does not suit to P. hysterophorus. However, there are reports that this weed has become a problem in agricultural fields in India (Evans, 1997). It could be attributed to the difference in agricultural practices in the two countries. The failure of Parthenium to establish itself in our agricultural fields seems to be due to wetland rice cultivation. Grazing response of cattle towards P. hysterophorus During surveys of various grazing pastures, it was found that cows, buffalos and sheep do not graze P. hysterophorus while goats readily grazed it (Fig. 4). Similar findings have also been reported earlier from India (Narasimhan et al., 1977). However, earlier workers have reported that in artificial feeding tests cattle accepted the weed alone or in mixtures with green fodder, with severe consequences. The majority developed severe dermatitis and toxic symptoms and lesions were found subsequently in the gastrointestinal tract, liver and kidneys (Narasimhan et al., 1977). Changes in blood chemistry and inhibition of liver dehydrogenases, as well as degenerative changes in both the liver and kidneys, have been reported in buffalo and sheep (Ahmad et al., 1988; Rajkumar et al., 1988). The milk of cattle may also be tainted by Parthenium (Towers and Rao, 1992). Table-1. Frequency and density of P. hysterophorus and other weeds in district Sialkot, Pakistan.
AF: Absolute frequency RF: Relative frequency AD: Absolute density RD: Relative density
![]() Fig. 1: Allelopathic grasses Desmostachya bipinnata (A) and Imperata cylindrica (B) restrict the growth of P. hysterophorus.
Fig. 2:
Frequency and density of P. hysterophorus in herb zone,
Imperata zone and
Desmostachya
Fig. 3: P. hysterophorus growing along the fields of rice (A), maize (B) and Bennincasa cerifera (C), and in the field of Citrullus vulgaris (D).
Fig. 4: Goats are eating P. hysterophorus.
REFERENCES CITEDAdkins, S.W., S.C. Navie and R.E. McFadyen. 1996. Control of Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.): A centre for tropical pest management team effort pp. 573-578. In R.C.H. Shepherd (ed.). Proc. 11th Aust. Weeds Conf., Weed Sci. Soc. Victoria, Frankston. Ahmad, M.N., P.R.S Rao, M. Mahender and A.S. Moorthy. 1988. A study on changes in blood chemistry in Parthenium toxicity in buffalo calves. Cherion. 17: 57-60. Anjum, T, R. Bajwa, A. Javaid. 2005. Biological Control of Parthenium I: Effect of Imperata cylindrica on distribution, germination and seedling growth of Parthenium hysterophorus L. Intl’. J. Agric. Biol. 6 (3): in press Chippendale, J.F. and F.D. Panetta. 1994. The cost of Parthenium weed to the Queensland cattle industry. Plant Prot. Quart. 9: 73-76. Dhawan, S.R. and P. Dhawan. 1996. Regeneration in Parthenium hysterophorus L. World Weeds 3:181-182. Evans, H.C. 1997. Parthenium hysterophorus: a review of its weed status and the possibilities for biological control. Biocontrol/News and Information, 18: 89-98. Javaid, A., T. Anjum, R. Bajwa. 2005. Biological Control of Parthenium II: Control of Parthenium hysterophorus L. by Aqueous Extracts of Allelopathic Grasses. Intl’. J. Biol. Biotech. 2(2): 459-463. Kohli, R.K. and D. Rani, 1994. Parthenium hysterophorus – a review. Res. Bull. Sci. Punjab University. 44: 105-149. McFadyen, R.E. 1992. Biological control against Parthenium weed in Australia. Crop Protection. 11: 400-407. Narasimhan, T.R., M. Ananth, M.N. Swamy and P.V.S. Rao. 1977. Toxicity of Parthenium hysterophorus L. Curr. Sci. 46: 15-16. Navie, S.C., R.E. McFadyen, F.D. Panetta and S.W. Adkins. 1996. The biology of Australian weeds 27. Parthenium hysterophorus L. Plant Prot. Quart. 11: 76-88. Oudhia, P. 1998. Parthenium: A curse for the biodiversity of Chhattisgarh plain. In: Abstract National Research Seminar on Biochemical changes. An impact on Environment, R.D. Govt. P.G. College, Mandla (M.P.) 30-31 July p.26. Rajkumar, E.D.M., N.V.N. Kumar, N.V.H. Haran and N.V.S. Ram. 1988. Antagonistic effect of Parthenium hysterophorus on succinate dehydrogenase of sheep liver. J. Environ. Biol. 9: 231-237. Srivastava, J.N., J.P. Shukla and R.C. Srivastava. 1985. Effect of Parthenium hysterophorus extract on the seed germination and seedling growth of barley, pea and wheat. Acta. Bot. India. 13: 194-197. Towers, G.H.N and P.V.S. Rao. 1992. Impact of the pan-tropical weed, Parthenium hysterophorus on human affairs. In: Richardson R.G. (ed), Proc. of the 1st Int. Weed Control Congress, Melbourne, Australia. Weed Science Society of Victoria, pp. 134-138.
[1]Department
of Mycology and Plant Pathology, University of the Punjab,
Quaid-i-Azam Campus, Lahore – Pakistan.
|
|
Copyrights© Weed Science Society of Pakistan® Department of Weed Science |









