Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res. 9(1-2):99-103, 2003

 

WEED DIVERSITY OF WHEAT CROP IN KHAIRPUR DISTRICT, SINDH

Rabia Asma Memon[1], G. Raza Bhatti1 and Shahida Khalid[2]

 

ABSTRACT

  The survey of weeds of Wheat crop was carried out in the fields of district Khairpur during 1999-2001. Twenty-four weed species were recorded representing nine families in the 2 X 2 m quadrats. Status of weed species based on their frequency percentage also proposed as assertive, ascendant, average and below average. Furthermore the family importance values (FIV) were used to compare the relative contribution of each taxonomic family to weed species composition.

           

Key words:  Wheat, weed diversity, weed status, FIV. 

 

INTRODUCTION

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) has an important position in the economy of Pakistan. As compared to advanced wheat growing countries Pakistan has low wheat production. Many factors are responsible for low wheat production, among these factors, the weed management has become a serious peril to wheat productivity as weeds not only reduce yield of crop but also deteriorate quality of the produce in many cases. Holm et al. (1979) estimated that there are about 8000 plant species act as weeds, of them only 250 species are important for world agriculture.  Such species compete with harvested crops and share in all requirements. According to Anderson (1983) weeds compete with crop mainly for light, nutrients, water and carbon dioxide. The damage caused by weeds through the loss of nutrients and water is major cause of concern to the growers. Schwerzel and Thomas (1971) observed that the weeds consumed three to four times more nitrogen, potassium and magnesium than a weed-free crop.

 

There are different views about the magnitude of weed losses in Pakistan. According to Qureshi (1982) weeds were responsible for causing up to thirty- percent loss in wheat yield under normal conditions. Gill et al. (1979) estimated loss from 15-50 percent. Hepworth (1979) and Shad (1987) reported that yield losses due to weeds were in proximity of 17-25 percent which in terms of wheat grains come to about 2.43 to 3.57 million tonnes annually. Muzik (1970) reported that weeds species cause greater losses than either insects or plant diseases, but unfortunately the capital investment on weed research is relatively much less as compared with the amount spend on insects or plant diseases research.

 

On the distribution of species Memon (2000) and Memon et al (2001) have compiled list of plants species from Wheat and Cotton crops of Khairpur District respectively. Keeping in view such constant threat to wheat crop across the country, the present study was carried out focusing on District Khairpur. This study aims to determine the diversity of weed species, their spectrum, density and frequency in wheat crop of Khairpur. This study will help in provide guidelines for effective weed control programme in wheat.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Twenty five sites/fields of wheat crop were selected from District Khairpur. In this regard Quadrat method (following Pound and Clements 1898) was applied for the collection of data. Five quadrats of 1m2 were selected from each site. Percentage of frequency and density was acquired with the help of following formula:

 

Frequency % =     No. of quadrats in which weed species occur  X 100

                                                                                Total number of quadrats laid out

 

Density % =     Total number of individual species in all quadrats             

                                                              Total number of quadrats laid out

 

Number of genera and species were also determined. Finally, family importance values (following Mori et al. 1983) were used to compare the relative contribution of each taxonomic family to weed species composition. It was calculated as the sum of the following two variables:

 

Relative Diversity =                              No. of species in family  x 100­

                                                          Total number of species

 

Relative Density =                               No. of individuals in family  x 100­

                                                       Total number of individuals

 

Specimens collected from the fields were pressed and mounted on herbarium sheets. These herbarium sheets are deposited in the herbarium of Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In all twenty four species were identified. Of them, six were of monocot group. Cyperus rotundus was only species representing family Cyperaceae. Frequency, density and status of all weed species are shown in Table 2.

 

In addition to recognized different categories of weeds such as Broad Leaf Weeds (BLW), Grassy Weeds (GW) and Sedges Weeds (SW), Memon (2000) determined two more categories of weeds as surpassing one, which are either taller than or somehow equal to actual crop in height, and underneath, which are smaller than the crop. The recorded weeds were assigned in aforementioned categories, which are present in Table 1.

 

The present statistics revealed a wide range of frequency percentage of all weed taxa from 3.20 to 64.80. Hence, these species were grouped into following four categories based on their frequency:

 

1.   

Assertive

Weed species having frequency more than 60%.

2.   

Ascendant

Weed species having frequency of 50-60%.

3.   

Average

Weed species having frequency of 30-49%.

4.   

Below average

Weed species having frequency below 30%.

 

Chenopodium ficifolium, and Anagallis arvensis were found most dominant having frequency of 64.80, and 64.00 %, respectively which fall under “Assertive” category. Whereas only single species Melilotus indica with 60.00 frequency % comes under “Ascendant” category. Medicago polymorpha a densely populated was recorded only from one site. Spergula arvensis, Spergularia marina and S. media were in mixed population, quite common and dominant weed species of saline soil. These species got a lot of morphological resemblance with each other. Each producing more than 5000 seeds plant-1. Their seed maturation takes place before wheat harvesting. Thus, they shed their seeds into wheat crop field and are remained in the soil to emerge as a huge population in coming season. Hence, it is a constant peril to wheat. Chenopodium ficifolium, Spergularia marina and S. media were reported for the first time as weeds. No one documented their occurrence as weed in Pakistan before. Marwat (1993) reported two species emerging as a weed in NWFP, one was Phragmites australis which is also found in Khairpur District. The plants of this species attain height of more than 3 meters.

 

In fact, two parameters i.e. relative diversity and relative density were calculated to show the family importance values (FIV), which depicted the potential diversity among weed species as, presented in Table 3. The most common family in wheat weeds was Papilionaceae having 58.04 FIV. Family Primulaceae, which stood among the top 4 families, contained just one species but was represented by 24.92% of individuals. In marked contrast Poaceae having 5 species and Caryophyllaceae having 4 species accounted for 8.87% and 5.69% of individuals respectively.

 

In order to assess the size of the families, the number of species to their respective genera was determined which are also indicated in Table 3. It suggested that all the twenty four weed species were belonging to nine families. Family Poaceae was represented by five genera and five species, Papilionaceae with five genera and seven species, Caryophyllaceae with 3 genera and four species, whereas Chenopodiaceae was the only family having one genus with three species.   

 
Table 1.   Showing Surpassing and Underneath weeds.

Surpassing

Underneath

Botanical Name

Vernacular Name

Family Name

Botanical Name

Vernacular Name

Family Name

Sonchus oleraceus

Pili Dodak

Asteraceae

Spergula arvensis

Hazar Dani

Caryophyllaceae

Vaccaria hispanica

-----

Caryophyllaceae

Spergularia marina

Hazar Dani

Caryophyllaceae

Chenopodium  album

Chill

Chenopodiaceae

Spergularia media.

Hazar Dani

Caryophyllaceae

Chenopodium ficifolium

Chill

Chenopodiaceae

Convolvulus arvensis

Naro

Convolvulaceae

Chenopodium murale

Chill

Chenopodiaceae

Cyperus rotundus

Kabbah

Cyperaceae

Plypogon fugax

Gidar Puchh

Poaceae

Vicia sativa

Matri

Papilionaceae

Phragmites australis

Narro

Poaceae

Vicia hirsute

Marti

Papilionaceae

Phalaris minor

Nor Puchh

Poaceae

Melilotus indica

Sinjh

Papilionaceae

Avena fatua

Jaww

Poaceae

Melilotus alba

Sinjh

Papilionaceae

Rumex dentatus

Jangli Palak

Polygonaceae

Medicago polymorpha

Luceni

Papilionaceae

 

 

 

Lathyrus aphaca

Jhangli Mater

Papilionaceae

 

 

 

Alhaji maurarum

Kandero

Papilionaceae

 

 

 

Cynodon dactylon

Chabbar

Poaceae

 

 

 

Anagallis arvensis

Billi Booti

Primulaceae

 
Table 2. Showing frequency, density and status of weeds.

S. No.

Status

Weed species

Frequency %

Density %

1

Assertive

Chenopodium ficifolium Sm.

64.80

5.09

2

Assertive

Anagallis arvensis L.

64.00

38.56

3

Ascendant

Melilotus indica (L) All.

60.00

30.33

4

Average

Spergula arvensis L.

33.60

27.97

5

Average

Chenopodium album L.

33.60

1.78

6

Average

Rumex dentatus L.

32.00

8.74

7

Below average

Cyperus rotundus L.

28.00

2.46

8

Below average

Phalaris minor Retz.

25.60

5.13

9

Below average

Convolvulus arvensis L.

24.80

2.66

10

Below average

Avena fatua L.

20.80

2.66

11

Below average

Spergularia media (L.) Prest.

20.00

4.02

12

Below average

Lathyrus aphaca L.

18.40

2.34

13

Below average

Chenopodium murale L.

17.60

1.94

14

Below average

Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.

16.60

3.75

15

Below average

Spergularia marina (L.) Griseb.

16.00

1.90

16

Below average

Melilotus alba Desr.

12.00

0.59

17

Below average

Sonchus oleraceous L.

11.20

0.96

18

Below average

Vicia sativa L.

11.20

0.97

19

Below average

Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin ex Steud.

10.40

0.81

20

Below average

Polypogon fugax Nees ex Steud.

8.80

1.38

21

Below average

Alhagi maurorum Medic.

7.20

0.32

22

Below average

Vicia hirsute (L.) S.F. Grey.

4.80

0.21

23

Below average

Medicago polymorpha L.

4.00

9.92

24

Below average

Vaccaria hispanica (Miller) Rauschert.

3.20

0.22

 

Table 3 Showing number of Genera, Species and Family Importance Values of Weeds

S.No.

Families

Genera

Species

FIV

1

Papilionaceae

5

7

58.04

2

Chenopodiaceae

1

3

34.55

3

Poaceae

5

5

29.70

4

Primulaceae

1

1

29.09

5

Caryophyllacea

3

4

22.36

6

Polygonaceae

1

1

9.82

7

Convolvulaceae

1

1

5.89

8

Cypraceae

1

1

5.76

    9

Asteraceae

1

1

4.79

 

REFERENCES CITED

 

Anderson, W.P. 1983. Weed Science Principles. 2nd Edt., West Pub.Co.,St.Paul, Minn, USA, pp. 33-42.

 

Gill, H.S., U.S. Walia and L.S. Brar. 1979. Chemical weed control in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with particular reference to Phalaris minor Retz. and wild oat (Avena ludoviciana Dew.) Pesticides 13(12):15-20. (Weed Absts.30(20):56, 1981).

 

Hepworth, H.M. 1979. Pakistan Weed Problems Proc. Natl. Seminar on Wheat Res. and Prod., Islamabad, Pakistan.

 

Holm, L., J.V. Pancho, J.P. Herberger and D.L. Pluchnett. 1979. A geographical Atlas of World Weeds. John Wiley N.Y. PP.391.

 

Marwat, K.B. 1993. Two new emerging weeds of N-W of Pakistan: Phragmites australis (Cav) Trin ex Steut and Xanthium strumarium L., posing threat to our future agriculture. PWSS Abstracts Vol. III Abs. No. 50.

 

Memon, R.A. 2000. Weeds a threat to wheat crop. In Agriculture & Technology, Dawn, Economic & Business Review, April 18, 2000.

 

Memon, R.A., G.R. Bhatti and S. Khalid. 2001. Weeds of cotton crop in district Khairpur. Pak. J. Bot. 33. (Special issue): 753-759.

 

Mori, S.A., B.M. Boom, A.M. de Carvalino and T.S. dos Santo 1983. Ecological importance of Mrtaceae in an Eastern Brazilian Wet forest. Biotropica 15: 68-70. 

 

Muzik, J.J. 1970. Weed Biology and Control. McGraw Hill Book Co; N.Y.

 

Pound, R. and P.E. Clements. 1898. A method of determining the abundance of secondary Weeds species. Minn. Bot. Studies 2:19.

 

Qureshi, F.A. 1982. Weed problems of Pakistan. pp. 5-6. In Identification and control of weed manual, PARC, Islamabad.

 

Schwerzel, P.J. and P.E.L. Thomas, P.E.L. 1971. Weed Competition in Cotton PANS. 17(1):30-34.

 

Shad, R.A. 1987. Status of weed science activities in Pakistan. Progressive Farming, PARC 7(1):10-16.


[1] Department of Botany, Department of Botany, Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur, Sindh, Pakistan

   E-mail: rabhatti@yahoo.com.

[2] Weed Science Program, National Agriculture Research Center, Islamabad, Pakistan.

 

Copyrights© Weed Science Society of Pakistan®

Department of Weed Science
NWFP Agricultural University Peshawar, 25130 Pakistan